You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Detecting the undetectable: Characterization, optimization, and validation of an eDNA detection assay for the federally endangered dwarf wedgemussel, Alasmidonta heterodon (Bivalvia: Unionoida)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Aquatic Conservation, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/aqc.3069 |
Authors |
William B. Schill, Heather S. Galbraith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 42% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 24% |
Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 32% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,288,083
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Conservation
#551
of 1,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,331
of 364,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Conservation
#15
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.