↓ Skip to main content

Efficiency of Primary Saliva Secretion: An Analysis of Parameter Dependence in Dynamic Single-Cell and Acinus Models, with Application to Aquaporin Knockout Studies

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Membrane Biology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficiency of Primary Saliva Secretion: An Analysis of Parameter Dependence in Dynamic Single-Cell and Acinus Models, with Application to Aquaporin Knockout Studies
Published in
The Journal of Membrane Biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00232-011-9413-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver J. Maclaren, James Sneyd, Edmund J. Crampin

Abstract

Secretion from the salivary glands is driven by osmosis following the establishment of osmotic gradients between the lumen, the cell and the interstitium by active ion transport. We consider a dynamic model of osmotically driven primary saliva secretion and use singular perturbation approaches and scaling assumptions to reduce the model. Our analysis shows that isosmotic secretion is the most efficient secretion regime and that this holds for single isolated cells and for multiple cells assembled into an acinus. For typical parameter variations, we rule out any significant synergistic effect on total water secretion of an acinar arrangement of cells about a single shared lumen. Conditions for the attainment of isosmotic secretion are considered, and we derive an expression for how the concentration gradient between the interstitium and the lumen scales with water- and chloride-transport parameters. Aquaporin knockout studies are interpreted in the context of our analysis and further investigated using simulations of transport efficiency with different membrane water permeabilities. We conclude that recent claims that aquaporin knockout studies can be interpreted as evidence against a simple osmotic mechanism are not supported by our work. Many of the results that we obtain are independent of specific transporter details, and our analysis can be easily extended to apply to models that use other proposed ionic mechanisms of saliva secretion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Professor 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 4 22%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Computer Science 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2012.
All research outputs
#16,042,980
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#616
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,894
of 250,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them