↓ Skip to main content

Drug Off-Target Effects Predicted Using Structural Analysis in the Context of a Metabolic Network Model

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug Off-Target Effects Predicted Using Structural Analysis in the Context of a Metabolic Network Model
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger L. Chang, Li Xie, Lei Xie, Philip E. Bourne, Bernhard Ø. Palsson

Abstract

Recent advances in structural bioinformatics have enabled the prediction of protein-drug off-targets based on their ligand binding sites. Concurrent developments in systems biology allow for prediction of the functional effects of system perturbations using large-scale network models. Integration of these two capabilities provides a framework for evaluating metabolic drug response phenotypes in silico. This combined approach was applied to investigate the hypertensive side effect of the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor torcetrapib in the context of human renal function. A metabolic kidney model was generated in which to simulate drug treatment. Causal drug off-targets were predicted that have previously been observed to impact renal function in gene-deficient patients and may play a role in the adverse side effects observed in clinical trials. Genetic risk factors for drug treatment were also predicted that correspond to both characterized and unknown renal metabolic disorders as well as cryptic genetic deficiencies that are not expected to exhibit a renal disorder phenotype except under drug treatment. This study represents a novel integration of structural and systems biology and a first step towards computational systems medicine. The methodology introduced herein has important implications for drug development and personalized medicine.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 4%
Luxembourg 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 295 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 30%
Researcher 79 24%
Student > Master 39 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 7%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 40 12%
Unknown 29 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 16%
Computer Science 36 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Engineering 16 5%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 42 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2012.
All research outputs
#3,773,612
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,220
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,930
of 107,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#14
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.