↓ Skip to main content

Measuring the Impacts of Community-based Grasslands Management in Mongolia's Gobi

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring the Impacts of Community-based Grasslands Management in Mongolia's Gobi
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030991
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig Leisher, Sebastiaan Hess, Timothy M. Boucher, Pieter van Beukering, M. Sanjayan

Abstract

We assessed a donor-funded grassland management project designed to create both conservation and livelihood benefits in the rangelands of Mongolia's Gobi desert. The project ran from 1995 to 2006, and we used remote sensing Normalized Differential Vegetation Index data from 1982 to 2009 to compare project grazing sites to matched control sites before and after the project's implementation. We found that the productivity of project grazing sites was on average within 1% of control sites for the 20 years before the project but generated 11% more biomass on average than the control areas from 2000 to 2009. To better understand the benefits of the improved grasslands to local people, we conducted 280 household interviews, 8 focus group discussions, and 31 key informant interviews across 6 districts. We found a 12% greater median annual income as well as a range of other socioeconomic benefits for project households compared to control households in the same areas. Overall, the project generated measurable benefits to both nature and people. The key factors underlying project achievements that may be replicable by other conservation projects include the community-driven approach of the project, knowledge exchanges within and between communities inside and outside the country, a project-supported local community organizer in each district, and strong community leadership.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 101 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 25%
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 32%
Environmental Science 30 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 10%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 6%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 15 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,666,782
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#63,411
of 193,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,818
of 247,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#744
of 3,365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.