You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mathematical modeling in cancer nanomedicine: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biomedical Microdevices, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10544-019-0380-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prashant Dogra, Joseph D. Butner, Yao-li Chuang, Sergio Caserta, Shreya Goel, C. Jeffrey Brinker, Vittorio Cristini, Zhihui Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 78% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 29 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 67 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2019.
All research outputs
#5,749,048
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#193
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,842
of 351,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.