You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Industry influenced evidence production in collaborative research communities: A network analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.10.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam G. Dunn, Blanca Gallego, Enrico Coiera |
| Abstract |
To measure the relative influence that industry authors have on collaborative research communities and evidence production. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Librarian | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 30% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2014.
All research outputs
#3,138,631
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#1,201
of 4,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,209
of 253,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.