You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Examining the correlates of meal skipping in Australian young adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0451-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felicity J. Pendergast, Katherine M. Livingstone, Anthony Worsley, Sarah A. McNaughton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 24% |
| Unknown | 45 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,405,160
of 23,327,904 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#852
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,853
of 352,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,327,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.