↓ Skip to main content

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) exacerbate severity of infant sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
29 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) exacerbate severity of infant sepsis
Published in
Critical Care, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13054-019-2407-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

David F. Colón, Carlos W. Wanderley, Marcelo Franchin, Camila M. Silva, Carlos H. Hiroki, Fernanda V. S. Castanheira, Paula B. Donate, Alexandre H. Lopes, Leila C. Volpon, Silvia K. Kavaguti, Vanessa F. Borges, Cesar A. Speck-Hernandez, Fernando Ramalho, Ana P. Carlotti, Fabio Carmona, Jose C. Alves-Filho, Foo Y. Liew, Fernando Q. Cunha

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#252,691
of 15,709,657 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#152
of 4,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,957
of 271,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,709,657 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them