You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Biology, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000188 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sophie K. Piper, Ulrike Grittner, Andre Rex, Nico Riedel, Felix Fischer, Robert Nadon, Bob Siegerink, Ulrich Dirnagl |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 8 | 23% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 20% |
France | 3 | 9% |
Denmark | 2 | 6% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 60% |
Scientists | 11 | 31% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
Researcher | 11 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Mathematics | 4 | 7% |
Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 28% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2022.
All research outputs
#447,913
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#921
of 7,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,461
of 356,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#32
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.