↓ Skip to main content

Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance?

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance?
Published in
PLoS Biology, April 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie K. Piper, Ulrike Grittner, Andre Rex, Nico Riedel, Felix Fischer, Robert Nadon, Bob Siegerink, Ulrich Dirnagl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 33%
Researcher 5 24%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Unspecified 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 29%
Unspecified 5 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Psychology 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Other 4 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#182,509
of 13,116,968 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#546
of 4,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,953
of 251,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,116,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.