↓ Skip to main content

Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance?

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
39 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exact replication: Foundation of science or game of chance?
Published in
PLoS Biology, April 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie K. Piper, Ulrike Grittner, Andre Rex, Nico Riedel, Felix Fischer, Robert Nadon, Bob Siegerink, Ulrich Dirnagl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Mathematics 4 7%
Computer Science 3 5%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 16 29%
Unknown 13 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2022.
All research outputs
#348,923
of 21,322,319 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#768
of 5,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,278
of 289,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,322,319 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.