The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,447 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Ten simple rules towards healthier research labs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006914 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernando T. Maestre |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 629 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 276 | 6% |
| Canada | 154 | 3% |
| Spain | 148 | 3% |
| Australia | 127 | 3% |
| Germany | 88 | 2% |
| France | 61 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 39 | <1% |
| India | 38 | <1% |
| Other | 377 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2510 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2199 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 2046 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 98 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 97 | 2% |
| Unknown | 7 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 870 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 870 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 197 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 178 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 81 | 9% |
| Professor | 55 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 6% |
| Other | 159 | 18% |
| Unknown | 146 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 204 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 79 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 62 | 7% |
| Engineering | 38 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 36 | 4% |
| Other | 226 | 26% |
| Unknown | 225 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2710. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#2,798
of 26,613,602 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2
of 9,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43
of 370,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,613,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.