↓ Skip to main content

The Principle of Double Effect and Proportionate Reason

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Principle of Double Effect and Proportionate Reason
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, May 2007
DOI 10.1001/virtualmentor.2007.9.5.pfor2-0705
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J Kockler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 42%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Philosophy 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,678,159
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,676
of 87,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them