↓ Skip to main content

空襲で焼け出された者の記憶 : ある「拓北農兵隊」の戦時と戦後をめぐって

Overview of attention for article published in Japan oral history review, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
空襲で焼け出された者の記憶 : ある「拓北農兵隊」の戦時と戦後をめぐって
Published in
Japan oral history review, September 2012
DOI 10.24530/jjoha.8.0_125
Authors

木村 豊

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,267,760
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japan oral history review
#6
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,657
of 188,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan oral history review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them