↓ Skip to main content

Exploring women’s preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
125 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring women’s preferences for birth settings in England: A discrete choice experiment
Published in
PLoS ONE, April 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0215098
Authors

Benjamin Rupert Fletcher, Rachel Rowe, Jennifer Hollowell, Miranda Scanlon, Lisa Hinton, Oliver Rivero-Arias

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2019.
All research outputs
#248,054
of 16,023,082 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#4,246
of 157,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,626
of 273,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#30
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,023,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.