↓ Skip to main content

Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
44 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis
Published in
PLoS ONE, April 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0215052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robbie C. M. van Aert, Jelte M. Wicherts, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 33%
Philosophy 2 22%
Psychology 2 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#432,490
of 13,220,608 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#7,991
of 141,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,130
of 253,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#42
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,220,608 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.