↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Laboratory Parameters in Placental Abruption: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Medicine, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic Laboratory Parameters in Placental Abruption: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
Published in
Journal of Clinical Medicine, April 2019
DOI 10.3390/jcm8040482
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pils, Paternostro, Bekos, Hager, Ristl, Ott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#11,603,081
of 14,644,185 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#1,760
of 3,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,325
of 213,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#94
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,644,185 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.