↓ Skip to main content

Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental DNA, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 248)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
56 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta‐analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species‐specific abundance in nature
Published in
Environmental DNA, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/edn3.7
Authors

Matthew C. Yates, Dylan J. Fraser, Alison M. Derry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 38%
Environmental Science 43 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 36 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#946,934
of 20,618,952 outputs
Outputs from Environmental DNA
#25
of 248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,927
of 230,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental DNA
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,618,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.