You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chest radiograph reading panel performance in a Bangladesh pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open Respiratory Research, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000393 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric D McCollum, Salahuddin Ahmed, Nabidul H Chowdhury, Syed J R Rizvi, Ahad M Khan, Arun D Roy, Abu Am Hanif, Farhan Pervaiz, Asm Nawshad U Ahmed, Ehteshamul H Farrukee, Mahmuda Monowara, Mohammad M Hossain, Fatema Doza, Bidoura Tanim, Farzana Alam, Nicole Simmons, Megan E Reller, Meagan Harrison, Holly B Schuh, Abdul Quaiyum, Samir K Saha, Nazma Begum, Mathuram Santosham, Lawrence H Moulton, William Checkley, Abdullah H Baqui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2019.
All research outputs
#5,573,561
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#273
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,392
of 351,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.