↓ Skip to main content

Prey items and predation behavior of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Nunavut, Canada based on Inuit hunter interviews

Overview of attention for article published in Aquatic Biosystems, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prey items and predation behavior of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Nunavut, Canada based on Inuit hunter interviews
Published in
Aquatic Biosystems, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/2046-9063-8-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven H Ferguson, Jeff W Higdon, Kristin H Westdal

Abstract

Killer whales (Orcinus orca) are the most widely distributed cetacean, occurring in all oceans worldwide, and within ocean regions different ecotypes are defined based on prey preferences. Prey items are largely unknown in the eastern Canadian Arctic and therefore we conducted a survey of Inuit Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) to provide information on the feeding ecology of killer whales. We compiled Inuit observations on killer whales and their prey items via 105 semi-directed interviews conducted in 11 eastern Nunavut communities (Kivalliq and Qikiqtaaluk regions) from 2007-2010.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 213 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 18%
Student > Master 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 14%
Researcher 28 13%
Other 14 6%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 38%
Environmental Science 44 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Unspecified 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 48 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#338,465
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Biosystems
#1
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,810
of 256,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Biosystems
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them