You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a cross-sectional observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-017-0263-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esther Witteveen, Juultje Sommers, Luuk Wieske, Jonne Doorduin, Nens van Alfen, Marcus J. Schultz, Ivo N. van Schaik, Janneke Horn, Camiel Verhamme |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,569,433
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#837
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,688
of 309,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.