↓ Skip to main content

Health Facility Characteristics and Their Relationship to Coverage of PMTCT of HIV Services across Four African Countries: The PEARL Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health Facility Characteristics and Their Relationship to Coverage of PMTCT of HIV Services across Four African Countries: The PEARL Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029823
Pubmed ID
Authors

Didier K. Ekouevi, Elizabeth Stringer, David Coetzee, Pius Tih, Tracy Creek, Kathryn Stinson, Andrew O. Westfall, Thomas Welty, Namwinga Chintu, Benjamin H. Chi, Cathy Wilfert, Nathan Shaffer, Jeff Stringer, Francois Dabis

Abstract

Health facility characteristics associated with effective prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) coverage in sub-Saharan are poorly understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 2%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 25%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 40%
Social Sciences 16 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 19 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2012.
All research outputs
#17,655,049
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,214
of 193,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,374
of 246,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,367
of 3,344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.