You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Health Facility Characteristics and Their Relationship to Coverage of PMTCT of HIV Services across Four African Countries: The PEARL Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0029823 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Didier K. Ekouevi, Elizabeth Stringer, David Coetzee, Pius Tih, Tracy Creek, Kathryn Stinson, Andrew O. Westfall, Thomas Welty, Namwinga Chintu, Benjamin H. Chi, Cathy Wilfert, Nathan Shaffer, Jeff Stringer, Francois Dabis |
Abstract |
Health facility characteristics associated with effective prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) coverage in sub-Saharan are poorly understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 25% |
Researcher | 19 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 22% |
Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 40% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2012.
All research outputs
#17,655,049
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#146,214
of 193,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,374
of 246,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,367
of 3,344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.