You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Climate Change, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nclimate1916 |
| Authors |
S. Asseng, F. Ewert, C. Rosenzweig, J. W. Jones, J. L. Hatfield, A. C. Ruane, K. J. Boote, P. J. Thorburn, R. P. Rötter, D. Cammarano, N. Brisson, B. Basso, P. Martre, P. K. Aggarwal, C. Angulo, P. Bertuzzi, C. Biernath, A. J. Challinor, J. Doltra, S. Gayler, R. Goldberg, R. Grant, L. Heng, J. Hooker, L. A. Hunt, J. Ingwersen, R. C. Izaurralde, K. C. Kersebaum, C. Müller, S. Naresh Kumar, C. Nendel, G. O’Leary, J. E. Olesen, T. M. Osborne, T. Palosuo, E. Priesack, D. Ripoche, M. A. Semenov, I. Shcherbak, P. Steduto, C. Stöckle, P. Stratonovitch, T. Streck, I. Supit, F. Tao, M. Travasso, K. Waha, D. Wallach, J. W. White, J. R. Williams, J. Wolf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 50% |
| France | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,007 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| France | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 960 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 225 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 209 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 128 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 59 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 5% |
| Other | 171 | 17% |
| Unknown | 164 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 324 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 176 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 94 | 9% |
| Engineering | 49 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 32 | 3% |
| Other | 95 | 9% |
| Unknown | 237 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#579,722
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#1,335
of 4,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,161
of 214,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#14
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 131.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.