You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reducing inappropriate prescribing for older adults with advanced frailty: A review based on a survey of practice in four countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maturitas, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.04.212 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rónán O’Caoimh, Nicola Cornally, Ciara McGlade, Yang Gao, Eileen O’Herlihy, Anton Svendrovski, Roger Clarnette, Amanda Hanora Lavan, Paul Gallagher, D. William Molloy |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 50 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#6,254,130
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Maturitas
#914
of 2,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,822
of 346,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maturitas
#19
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.