You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A clinical evaluation of two central venous catheter stabilization systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0519-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tarja J. Karpanen, Anna L. Casey, Tony Whitehouse, Jean-Francois Timsit, Olivier Mimoz, Mercedes Palomar, Tom S. J. Elliott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,677,511
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#925
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,385
of 350,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#23
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.