↓ Skip to main content

Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
99 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007019.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Butler, Timothy J Schultz, Phil Halligan, Ann Sheridan, Leigh Kinsman, Thomas Rotter, Jonathan Beaumier, Robyn Gail Kelly, Jonathan Drennan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 83 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 26%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#264,797
of 14,020,675 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#669
of 10,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,499
of 262,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,020,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.