↓ Skip to main content

Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
101 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007019.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Butler, Timothy J Schultz, Phil Halligan, Ann Sheridan, Leigh Kinsman, Thomas Rotter, Jonathan Beaumier, Robyn Gail Kelly, Jonathan Drennan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 169 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 54 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 27%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 42 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2019.
All research outputs
#330,057
of 15,840,713 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#773
of 11,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,201
of 271,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,840,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.