↓ Skip to main content

Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
60 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011903.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhavan Prasad Rai, Jasper Bondad, Nikhil Vasdev, Jim Adshead, Tim Lane, Kamran Ahmed, Mohammed S Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Khurshid Guru, Piotr L Chlosta, Omar M Aboumarzouk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Other 18 11%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 57 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Computer Science 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 65 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#988,727
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,939
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,020
of 364,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.