↓ Skip to main content

Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
67 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011903.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhavan Prasad Rai, Jasper Bondad, Nikhil Vasdev, Jim Adshead, Tim Lane, Kamran Ahmed, Mohammed S Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Khurshid Guru, Piotr L Chlosta, Omar M Aboumarzouk

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#384,853
of 13,533,353 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,105
of 10,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,080
of 255,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,533,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.