↓ Skip to main content

Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
65 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011903.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhavan Prasad Rai, Jasper Bondad, Nikhil Vasdev, Jim Adshead, Tim Lane, Kamran Ahmed, Mohammed S Khan, Prokar Dasgupta, Khurshid Guru, Piotr L Chlosta, Omar M Aboumarzouk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Other 18 11%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 57 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Computer Science 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 65 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#907,932
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,776
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,498
of 363,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.