↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 3. Miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 3. Miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Molano Franco, Víctor H Nieto Estrada, Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay, Arturo J Martí-Carvajal, Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,933,742
of 13,606,339 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,597
of 10,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,326
of 255,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,606,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.