You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A survey of current and past Pediatric Infectious Diseases fellows regarding training
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-72 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Miltiadis Douvoyiannis, Nathan Litman, Peter F Belamarich, David L Goldman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 17% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,668,780
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,390
of 3,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,573
of 132,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.