↓ Skip to main content

Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (PACE): a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (PACE): a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety
Published in
The Lancet, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30420-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek K Chu, Robert A Wood, Shannon French, Alessandro Fiocchi, Manel Jordana, Susan Waserman, Jan L Brożek, Holger J Schünemann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 248 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Other 17 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 39 26%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 32%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 35 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 768. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#10,633
of 15,869,024 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#331
of 35,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353
of 271,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#11
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,869,024 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.