You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (PACE): a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30420-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Derek K Chu, Robert A Wood, Shannon French, Alessandro Fiocchi, Manel Jordana, Susan Waserman, Jan L Brożek, Holger J Schünemann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 233 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 22% |
| Canada | 26 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 10% |
| France | 13 | 6% |
| Spain | 12 | 5% |
| Romania | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 77 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 147 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 15% |
| Scientists | 33 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 334 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 12% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Other | 62 | 19% |
| Unknown | 95 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 29 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 18% |
| Unknown | 116 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 825. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,824
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#572
of 42,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#455
of 364,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#10
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.