↓ Skip to main content

Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (PACE): a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (PACE): a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety
Published in
The Lancet, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30420-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek K Chu, Robert A Wood, Shannon French, Alessandro Fiocchi, Manel Jordana, Susan Waserman, Jan L Brożek, Holger J Schünemann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 248 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Other 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Master 20 11%
Other 52 28%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 42 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 777. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#11,953
of 16,994,048 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#370
of 36,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#359
of 274,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#11
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,994,048 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.