↓ Skip to main content

Historical Modes of Perpetual Penal Confinement: Theories and Practices before Life Without Parole

Overview of attention for article published in Law & Social Inquiry, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Historical Modes of Perpetual Penal Confinement: Theories and Practices before Life Without Parole
Published in
Law & Social Inquiry, April 2019
DOI 10.1017/lsi.2018.25
Authors

Christopher Seeds

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 100%
Unspecified 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,703,350
of 13,628,925 outputs
Outputs from Law & Social Inquiry
#151
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,595
of 255,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law & Social Inquiry
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,628,925 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.