↓ Skip to main content

Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004317.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha Mack, Tineke J Crawford, Jeanne-Marie Guise, Mario Chen, Thomas W Grey, Paul J Feldblum, Laurie L Stockton, Maria F Gallo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 18%
Social Sciences 12 14%
Psychology 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 27 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,942,849
of 16,024,087 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,416
of 11,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,002
of 272,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,024,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.