↓ Skip to main content

Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter‐term hormonal methods of contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter‐term hormonal methods of contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004317.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha Mack, Tineke J Crawford, Jeanne‐Marie Guise, Mario Chen, Thomas W Grey, Paul J Feldblum, Laurie L Stockton, Maria F Gallo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 14%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 37 13%
Unknown 115 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 11%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Psychology 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 128 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,600,501
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,973
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,060
of 363,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.