↓ Skip to main content

Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004317.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha Mack, Tineke J Crawford, Jeanne-Marie Guise, Mario Chen, Thomas W Grey, Paul J Feldblum, Laurie L Stockton, Maria F Gallo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 26 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,403,940
of 14,619,233 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,006
of 11,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,325
of 265,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,619,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.