↓ Skip to main content

High GUD Incidence in the Early 20th Century Created a Particularly Permissive Time Window for the Origin and Initial Spread of Epidemic HIV Strains

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High GUD Incidence in the Early 20th Century Created a Particularly Permissive Time Window for the Origin and Initial Spread of Epidemic HIV Strains
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009936
Pubmed ID
Authors

João Dinis de Sousa, Viktor Müller, Philippe Lemey, Anne-Mieke Vandamme

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Belgium 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 118 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#865,000
of 25,525,181 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#11,336
of 222,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,441
of 103,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#41
of 701 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,525,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 701 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.