↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravenous or enteral loop diuretics for preterm infants with (or developing) chronic lung disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001453.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audra Stewart, Luc P Brion

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 17 15%
Other 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 22 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,728,555
of 16,292,334 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,843
of 11,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,049
of 271,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,292,334 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.