↓ Skip to main content

STRONGkids validation: tool accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pediatria, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
STRONGkids validation: tool accuracy
Published in
Jornal de Pediatria, May 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2018.12.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliana Rolim Vieira Maciel, Eduardo Yoshio Nakano, Kênia Mara Baiocchi de Carvalho, Eliane Said Dutra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 21%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 18 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 23 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#11,704,022
of 14,759,386 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pediatria
#381
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,240
of 264,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pediatria
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,759,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.