↓ Skip to main content

Propionic Acid Contents in Foods

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi, January 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Propionic Acid Contents in Foods
Published in
Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi, January 1986
DOI 10.4327/jsnfs.39.231
Authors

Keisuke HOSOTANI, MORI Mayumi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,215,378
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi
#58
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,836
of 42,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them