You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
SOD1-positive aggregate accumulation in the CNS predicts slower disease progression and increased longevity in a mutant SOD1 mouse model of ALS
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-43164-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cindy Gill, James P. Phelan, Theo Hatzipetros, Joshua D. Kidd, Valerie R. Tassinari, Beth Levine, Monica Z. Wang, Andrew Moreno, Kenneth Thompson, Marcel Maier, Jan Grimm, Alan Gill, Fernando G. Vieira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 23% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
Thailand | 1 | 5% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 95% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
Researcher | 16 | 13% |
Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 38 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 25% |
Neuroscience | 24 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Unknown | 43 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,586,881
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#14,920
of 126,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,320
of 350,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#369
of 2,984 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,984 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.