↓ Skip to main content

Toarcian land vegetation loss

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toarcian land vegetation loss
Published in
Nature Geoscience, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41561-019-0366-y
Authors

Luke Mander, Jennifer C. McElwain

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Decision Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,011,978
of 25,024,586 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#2,492
of 3,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,151
of 356,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#50
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,024,586 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.