↓ Skip to main content

Stochastically Gating Ion Channels Enable Patterned Spike Firing through Activity-Dependent Modulation of Spike Probability

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stochastically Gating Ion Channels Enable Patterned Spike Firing through Activity-Dependent Modulation of Spike Probability
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, February 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua T. Dudman, Matthew F. Nolan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Israel 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 88 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 27%
Researcher 26 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 44%
Neuroscience 16 16%
Computer Science 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,313,103
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,488
of 8,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,236
of 189,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#31
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.