You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ultrasound Evidence of Early Fetal Growth Restriction after Maternal Malaria Infection
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0031411 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcus J. Rijken, Aris T. Papageorghiou, Supan Thiptharakun, Suporn Kiricharoen, Saw Lu Mu Dwell, Jacher Wiladphaingern, Mupawjay Pimanpanarak, Stephen H. Kennedy, François Nosten, Rose McGready |
Abstract |
Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT), the main strategy to prevent malaria and reduce anaemia and low birthweight, focuses on the second half of pregnancy. However, intrauterine growth restriction may occur earlier in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to measure the effects of malaria in the first half of pregnancy by comparing the fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) of infected and uninfected women whose pregnancies had been accurately dated by crown rump length (CRL) before 14 weeks of gestation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 20% |
Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 21% |
Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 31 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,340,745
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#42,441
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,077
of 260,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#529
of 3,439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.