You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Childhood Socioeconomic Position and Objectively Measured Physical Capability Levels in Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0015564 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Birnie, Rachel Cooper, Richard M. Martin, Diana Kuh, Avan Aihie Sayer, Beatriz E. Alvarado, Antony Bayer, Kaare Christensen, Sung-il Cho, Cyrus Cooper, Janie Corley, Leone Craig, Ian J. Deary, Panayotes Demakakos, Shah Ebrahim, John Gallacher, Alan J. Gow, David Gunnell, Steven Haas, Tomas Hemmingsson, Hazel Inskip, Soong-nang Jang, Kenya Noronha, Merete Osler, Alberto Palloni, Finn Rasmussen, Brigitte Santos-Eggimann, Jacques Spagnoli, John Starr, Andrew Steptoe, Holly Syddall, Per Tynelius, David Weir, Lawrence J. Whalley, Maria Victoria Zunzunegui, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Rebecca Hardy, on behalf of the HALCyon study team |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 18% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 23% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 67 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,919,343
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#50,712
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,594
of 200,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#332
of 1,349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.