↓ Skip to main content

Protocol: Streamlined sub-protocols for floral-dip transformation and selection of transformants in Arabidopsis thaliana

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
345 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol: Streamlined sub-protocols for floral-dip transformation and selection of transformants in Arabidopsis thaliana
Published in
Plant Methods, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-5-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda M Davis, Anthony Hall, Andrew J Millar, Chiarina Darrah, Seth J Davis

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 1%
United States 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 319 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 28%
Researcher 79 23%
Student > Master 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 5%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 20 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 255 74%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 13%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 32 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,979,190
of 15,019,833 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#105
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,441
of 267,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,019,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.