↓ Skip to main content

Protocol: Streamlined sub-protocols for floral-dip transformation and selection of transformants in Arabidopsis thaliana

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol: Streamlined sub-protocols for floral-dip transformation and selection of transformants in Arabidopsis thaliana
Published in
Plant Methods, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-5-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amanda M Davis, Anthony Hall, Andrew J Millar, Chiarina Darrah, Seth J Davis

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 331 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 27%
Researcher 77 22%
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 5%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 27 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 254 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 14%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 39 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,416,361
of 17,359,532 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#129
of 835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,773
of 270,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,359,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.