↓ Skip to main content

Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,387)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
45 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina Beier, Mark Schweda, Silke Schicktanz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Computer Science 5 13%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Philosophy 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#759,774
of 15,285,871 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#38
of 1,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,242
of 267,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,285,871 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.