↓ Skip to main content

Functional detection of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A to F by monoclonal neoepitope-specific antibodies and suspension array technology

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Functional detection of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A to F by monoclonal neoepitope-specific antibodies and suspension array technology
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-41722-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura von Berg, Daniel Stern, Diana Pauly, Stefan Mahrhold, Jasmin Weisemann, Lisa Jentsch, Eva-Maria Hansbauer, Christian Müller, Marc A. Avondet, Andreas Rummel, Martin B. Dorner, Brigitte G. Dorner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Student > Bachelor 3 38%
Unspecified 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 25%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Chemistry 1 13%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,161,811
of 13,770,158 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#10,307
of 68,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,094
of 255,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,770,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.