You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional detection of botulinum neurotoxin serotypes A to F by monoclonal neoepitope-specific antibodies and suspension array technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-41722-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura von Berg, Daniel Stern, Diana Pauly, Stefan Mahrhold, Jasmin Weisemann, Lisa Jentsch, Eva-Maria Hansbauer, Christian Müller, Marc A. Avondet, Andreas Rummel, Martin B. Dorner, Brigitte G. Dorner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 33% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 26% |
| Researcher | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,059,449
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#18,693
of 142,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,003
of 368,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#582
of 4,055 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,055 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.