↓ Skip to main content

Minimal Size of Cell Assemblies Coordinated by Gamma Oscillations

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimal Size of Cell Assemblies Coordinated by Gamma Oscillations
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002362
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Börgers, Giovanni Talei Franzesi, Fiona E. N. LeBeau, Edward S. Boyden, Nancy J. Kopell

Abstract

In networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons with mutual synaptic coupling, specific drive to sub-ensembles of cells often leads to gamma-frequency (25-100 Hz) oscillations. When the number of driven cells is too small, however, the synaptic interactions may not be strong or homogeneous enough to support the mechanism underlying the rhythm. Using a combination of computational simulation and mathematical analysis, we study the breakdown of gamma rhythms as the driven ensembles become too small, or the synaptic interactions become too weak and heterogeneous. Heterogeneities in drives or synaptic strengths play an important role in the breakdown of the rhythms; nonetheless, we find that the analysis of homogeneous networks yields insight into the breakdown of rhythms in heterogeneous networks. In particular, if parameter values are such that in a homogeneous network, it takes several gamma cycles to converge to synchrony, then in a similar, but realistically heterogeneous network, synchrony breaks down altogether. This leads to the surprising conclusion that in a network with realistic heterogeneity, gamma rhythms based on the interaction of excitatory and inhibitory cell populations must arise either rapidly, or not at all. For given synaptic strengths and heterogeneities, there is a (soft) lower bound on the possible number of cells in an ensemble oscillating at gamma frequency, based simply on the requirement that synaptic interactions between the two cell populations be strong enough. This observation suggests explanations for recent experimental results concerning the modulation of gamma oscillations in macaque primary visual cortex by varying spatial stimulus size or attention level, and for our own experimental results, reported here, concerning the optogenetic modulation of gamma oscillations in kainate-activated hippocampal slices. We make specific predictions about the behavior of pyramidal cells and fast-spiking interneurons in these experiments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 5%
United Kingdom 6 3%
Japan 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 147 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 36%
Researcher 35 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 10%
Professor 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 11 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 35%
Neuroscience 30 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Computer Science 11 6%
Engineering 11 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 17 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2012.
All research outputs
#3,011,835
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,664
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,278
of 254,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#25
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.