You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Switching the Magnetic Vortex Core in a Single Nanoparticle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACS Nano, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acsnano.5b06776 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena Pinilla-Cienfuegos, Samuel Mañas-Valero, Alicia Forment-Aliaga, Eugenio Coronado |
| Abstract |
Imaging and manipulating the spin structure of nano- and mesoscale magnetic systems is a challenging topic in magnetism, yielding a wide range of spin phenomena such as skyrmions, hedgehog-like spin structures, or vortices. A key example has been provided by the vortex spin texture, which can be addressed in four independent states of magnetization, enabling the development of multibit magnetic storage media. Most of the works devoted to the study of the magnetization reversal mechanisms of the magnetic vortices have been focused on micrometer-size magnetic platelets. Here we report the experimental observation of the vortex state formation and annihilation in individual 25 nm molecular-based magnetic nanoparticles measured by low-temperature variable-field magnetic force microscopy. Interestingly, in these nanoparticles the switching of the vortex core can be induced with very small values of the applied static magnetic field. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 33% |
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 19 | 31% |
| Materials Science | 12 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#15,361,255
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from ACS Nano
#10,207
of 12,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,949
of 395,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Nano
#220
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.