↓ Skip to main content

Preventive lipid‐based nutrient supplements given with complementary foods to infants and young children 6 to 23 months of age for health, nutrition, and developmental outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
455 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preventive lipid‐based nutrient supplements given with complementary foods to infants and young children 6 to 23 months of age for health, nutrition, and developmental outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012611.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Yousaf Bashir Hadi, Sana Sadiq Sheikh, Afsah Z Bhutta, Zita Weise Prinzo, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 455 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 9%
Student > Bachelor 41 9%
Researcher 35 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 7%
Student > Postgraduate 27 6%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 207 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 12%
Social Sciences 26 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 2%
Other 38 8%
Unknown 224 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,870,996
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,023
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,759
of 363,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.