You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sedentary Behaviour and Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in Mid-Life: The Role of Television-Viewing and Sitting at Work
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0031132 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Snehal M. Pinto Pereira, Myung Ki, Chris Power |
Abstract |
Knowledge of sedentary behaviour associations with health has relied mainly on television-viewing as a proxy and studies with other measures are less common. To clarify whether sedentary behaviour is associated with disease-risk, we examined associations for television-viewing and sitting at work. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Papua New Guinea | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 213 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
Researcher | 25 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
Other | 42 | 19% |
Unknown | 44 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
Sports and Recreations | 22 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 7% |
Other | 32 | 14% |
Unknown | 65 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#12,852,960
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#100,071
of 193,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,270
of 247,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,536
of 3,420 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,504 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,420 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.