↓ Skip to main content

Different methods of external fixation for treating distal radial fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different methods of external fixation for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006522.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen HG Handoll, James S Huntley, Rajan Madhok

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 158 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Engineering 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 28 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2016.
All research outputs
#3,639,772
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,956
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,355
of 267,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.