↓ Skip to main content

Different methods of external fixation for treating distal radial fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different methods of external fixation for treating distal radial fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006522.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen HG Handoll, James S Huntley, Rajan Madhok

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 22%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Researcher 20 9%
Other 16 7%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 41 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Engineering 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 55 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,667
of 168,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.