↓ Skip to main content

Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and flutter

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and flutter
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002903.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian E Mead, Andrew Elder, Andrew D Flapan, John Cordina

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 25%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 7 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#3,453,661
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,650
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,034
of 292,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.