You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Modeling and prediction of flow-induced hemolysis: a review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10237-019-01137-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohammad M. Faghih, M. Keith Sharp |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 29 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 48 | 44% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
Materials Science | 4 | 4% |
Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
Chemical Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#122
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,249
of 354,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.