↓ Skip to main content

Gel from unripe Musa sapientum peel to repair surgical wounds in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gel from unripe Musa sapientum peel to repair surgical wounds in rats
Published in
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0102-86502011000500009

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2012.
All research outputs
#9,126,768
of 14,534,149 outputs
Outputs from Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
#65
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,983
of 213,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,534,149 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.